Thursday, April 25, 2013

Relevance of Social Media in Indian Democracy

Indians have been more social in comparison to other societies of the world. They like to be in touch with their relatives & friends. The Marriage ceremony or any small function attracts a huge gathering. The person who is more social is treated with respect in Indian society.
Indians are so social that in small town / village a person can be recognized by his name or his father / grandfather’s name.

Since 1990, the trend started when lots of youth started migrating to Metros for Job or better opportunity and thus in new city they lost their identity and even their social life. This created an individual, who was neither in touch nor concerned about the problems of his home town. Being away from home town, this generation became inactive in socio – political issues. This new class which emerged had a hidden desire of being social but lacked time & avenues.

Social networking sites gave a platform to these youngsters, where they were able to find their old friends and relatives spread over the globe. This was one of the reasons for drastic growth in number of users in India. Orkut as a social networking site gather momentum, and finally took over by Facebook & Twitter. At present according to Internet & Mobile Association of India, there are 6.80 Crore, Facebook users & 1.8 Crore Twitter account in India. This figure in future will go up as there are 13.70 Crore Internet users in India, which is approx 11% of India total populations.

The first phase of Social networking sites was over and the user were settled, the group started discussing general issues, about the society and our country. The New Channel were pouring news 24X7 in every house in 1990 decades, and thus making people more informative on every issue.  Those people, who were busy in earning through job or self employment, were settled in life and now they started raising their concern about the situation of the country. These people who were working in Private organization were getting better salary, thus making their life easier. They started comparing the service level of private sector with government organization which leads to dissatisfaction towards government.

Being in Metro and working in private organization they started feeling helpless on the situation of country and ineffective governance. The social networking sites become the platform where they started discussing the issue and raise their concerns. This gave the opportunity to outlet their frustration and somewhere mental satisfaction. 

The internet boom also gave direct access to information to the people, who were earlier only relying on News Paper and then to the news channels. This another direct source of Information led to a more conscious citizen, who started evaluating the News shown on News Channels or News paper  and wherever they felt wrong, the group started targeting News Channel too. This lead to birth of a group called “Social Media” and it’s started acting like a watch dog for Media. The journalist who always challenged, system and leaders were now been questioned by this Social Media group, which was uncomfortable to the journalist, many negative reaction by senior journalist can be seen.  The rise of Fifth Pillar of democracy was obvious not welcome by other Four Pillars, but can’t be ignored too.

 Being a democratic country, the Freedom of Speech which was only on streets, can be avoided by Section 144, enters into the gallery of Parliaments. Unwittingly it rang the bells of the highest temple of democracy, and the power was alert, tried to tame down the flow through Section 66A.

The “Social Media” now become tool, a tool to challenge, a tool to propagate. It becomes a platform where a thought of people can come together and implement their thought or protest on issue. The case can be seen in ANNA Andolan & then after Protest against Rape incident of NIRBHAYA. The group was same, who felt that they can contribute to a change, by devoting their weekends. They got a place to protest and a group to strength. There was no binding within the group, except a common cause. Social Media act as a glue to these people who are concern about the society & the country and participation in the democracy, which was only ONCE in five years, changed its cycle.  The participation by common people in democracy is no more time bound but now issue based. An issue which even ignored by Media can become an issue of “WE THE PEOPLE” thus completing the Cycle of democracy.

An infant is born, but it will take time to grow up, it still have to walk on its leg, which will help him to reach to the polling booth. The views, the protest, the courage has to be converted into votes else it will be another “Virtual Tiger”.  The recent example of Parvez Musharraf who was having approx 9 Lakhs Likes on his Facebook page & 22 Thousand followers on twitter, which compelled him to return to Pakistan didn’t turn up on ground. They didn’t come out from the virtual world and reality changed. Mr. Musharraf is house arrest, and not a single protest.
 Considering the population of India, the social media has a long way to go, remember Mahatma Gandhi ji statement "The true India is to be found not in its few cities, but in its seven hundred thousand villages”